For Christmas I received an intriguing present from a friend - my really own “very popular” book.

“Tech-Splaining for Dummies” (terrific title) bears my name and my picture on its cover, and it has radiant reviews.

Yet it was completely written by AI, with a couple of simple triggers about me supplied by my friend Janet.

It’s a fascinating read, asystechnik.com and very funny in parts. But it likewise meanders quite a lot, and is someplace between a self-help book and a stream of anecdotes.

It imitates my chatty design of writing, but it’s likewise a bit repetitive, and extremely verbose. It may have exceeded Janet’s triggers in looking at information about me.

Several sentences start “as a leading technology journalist …” - cringe - which could have been scraped from an online bio.

There’s also a mysterious, repetitive hallucination in the kind of my cat (I have no animals). And there’s a metaphor on almost every page - some more random than others.

There are dozens of companies online offering AI-book composing services. My book was from BookByAnyone.

When I got in touch with the Adir Mashiach, based in Israel, he informed me he had offered around 150,000 personalised books, generally in the US, considering that rotating from assembling AI-generated travel guides in June 2024.

A paperback copy of your own 240-page long best-seller costs ₤ 26. The firm uses its own AI tools to generate them, based upon an open source big language design.

I’m not asking you to buy my book. Actually you can’t - just Janet, who created it, can buy any further copies.

There is presently no barrier to anyone developing one in anybody’s name, consisting of stars - although Mr Mashiach says there are guardrails around abusive content. Each book includes a printed disclaimer stating that it is imaginary, developed by AI, and designed “exclusively to bring humour and pleasure”.

Legally, the copyright belongs to the firm, but Mr Mashiach stresses that the item is meant as a “customised gag present”, and the books do not get sold further.

He wants to broaden his range, generating different genres such as sci-fi, and perhaps using an autobiography service. It’s designed to be a light-hearted kind of consumer AI - offering AI-generated items to human customers.

It’s also a bit scary if, like me, you write for a living. Not least because it probably took less than a minute to create, bio.rogstecnologia.com.br and it does, certainly in some parts, sound much like me.

Musicians, authors, artists and stars worldwide have actually expressed alarm about their work being used to train generative AI tools that then churn out comparable content based upon it.

“We need to be clear, when we are speaking about data here, we really indicate human developers’ life works,” says Ed Newton Rex, creator of Fairly Trained, which projects for AI firms to respect creators’ rights.

“This is books, this is articles, this is pictures. It’s masterpieces. It’s records … The entire point of AI training is to discover how to do something and then do more like that.”

In 2023 a song including AI-generated voices of Canadian vocalists Drake and The Weeknd went viral on social media before being pulled from streaming platforms because it was not their work and they had not consented to it. It didn’t stop the track’s developer trying to nominate it for a Grammy award. And although the artists were phony, it was still wildly popular.

“I do not think the use of generative AI for innovative purposes need to be prohibited, however I do think that generative AI for these purposes that is trained on individuals’s work without consent must be prohibited,” Mr Newton Rex includes. “AI can be extremely powerful however let’s construct it ethically and relatively.”

OpenAI says Chinese competitors using its work for their AI apps

DeepSeek: The Chinese AI app that has the world talking

China’s DeepSeek AI shakes industry and dents America’s swagger

In the UK some organisations - including the BBC - have chosen to obstruct AI developers from trawling their online material for training purposes. Others have chosen to work together - the Financial Times has actually partnered with ChatGPT creator OpenAI for example.

The UK government is thinking about an overhaul of the law that would enable AI designers to utilize creators’ material on the internet to assist develop their models, unless the rights holders pull out.

Ed Newton Rex explains this as “insanity”.

He mentions that AI can make advances in areas like defence, health care and logistics without trawling the work of authors, reporters and artists.

“All of these things work without going and altering copyright law and ruining the livelihoods of the nation’s creatives,” he argues.

Baroness Kidron, a crossbench peer in your home of Lords, is also highly versus getting rid of copyright law for AI.

“Creative industries are wealth developers, 2.4 million tasks and a whole lot of happiness,” states the Baroness, who is likewise a consultant to the Institute for Ethics in AI at Oxford University.

“The government is weakening among its finest performing markets on the unclear pledge of development.”

A federal government spokesperson said: “No relocation will be made till we are definitely confident we have a useful plan that delivers each of our goals: increased control for right holders to help them license their material, access to premium product to train leading AI models in the UK, and more transparency for best holders from AI developers.”

Under the UK government’s brand-new AI strategy, disgaeawiki.info a national information library containing public information from a wide variety of sources will likewise be offered to AI researchers.

In the US the future of federal guidelines to control AI is now up in the air following President Trump’s return to the presidency.

In 2023 Biden signed an executive order that intended to enhance the security of AI with, to name a few things, companies in the sector required to share details of the operations of their systems with the US government before they are launched.

But this has actually now been reversed by Trump. It stays to be seen what Trump will do rather, but he is said to desire the AI sector to deal with less regulation.

This comes as a number of suits against AI firms, and especially against OpenAI, continue in the US. They have been gotten by everybody from the New york city Times to authors, music labels, and even a comedian.

They declare that the AI firms broke the law when they took their material from the internet without their permission, and used it to train their systems.

The AI business argue that their actions fall under “fair usage” and are for that reason exempt. There are a variety of elements which can constitute fair use - it’s not a straight-forward definition. But the AI sector is under increasing examination over how it collects training data and whether it ought to be paying for it.

If this wasn’t all enough to ponder, Chinese AI firm DeepSeek has shaken the sector over the previous week. It ended up being one of the most downloaded complimentary app on Apple’s US App Store.

DeepSeek claims that it established its innovation for a fraction of the price of the similarity OpenAI. Its success has raised security issues in the US, and threatens American’s current supremacy of the sector.

As for me and a career as an author, I believe that at the moment, if I truly desire a “bestseller” I’ll still need to write it myself. If anything, Tech-Splaining for macphersonwiki.mywikis.wiki Dummies highlights the existing weak point in generative AI tools for bigger jobs. It is complete of inaccuracies and hallucinations, and it can be quite tough to read in parts due to the fact that it’s so verbose.

But given how rapidly the tech is evolving, I’m unsure the length of time I can remain confident that my substantially slower human writing and modifying abilities, are much better.

Sign up for our Tech Decoded newsletter to follow the biggest advancements in worldwide innovation, with analysis from BBC correspondents around the globe.

Outside the UK? Register here.