For Christmas I got an interesting gift from a friend - my really own “very popular” book.

“Tech-Splaining for Dummies” (terrific title) bears my name and my photo on its cover, and it has glowing reviews.

Yet it was completely written by AI, with a few simple triggers about me provided by my good friend Janet.

It’s a fascinating read, and really funny in parts. But it likewise meanders rather a lot, and is somewhere between a self-help book and a stream of anecdotes.

It simulates my chatty style of composing, but it’s likewise a bit repeated, and extremely verbose. It may have gone beyond Janet’s triggers in looking at information about me.

Several sentences begin “as a leading innovation reporter …” - cringe - which might have been scraped from an online bio.

There’s likewise a mysterious, repetitive hallucination in the form of my feline (I have no animals). And there’s a metaphor on almost every page - some more random than others.

There are dozens of business online offering AI-book writing services. My book was from BookByAnyone.

When I called the president Adir Mashiach, greyhawkonline.com based in Israel, he told me he had actually offered around 150,000 customised books, generally in the US, because rotating from compiling AI-generated travel guides in June 2024.

A paperback copy of your own 240-page long best-seller costs ₤ 26. The company uses its own AI tools to produce them, based upon an open source big language model.

I’m not asking you to purchase my book. Actually you can’t - just Janet, who developed it, can purchase any further copies.

There is presently no barrier to anybody creating one in any person’s name, including celebrities - although Mr Mashiach states there are guardrails around violent content. Each book contains a printed disclaimer mentioning that it is fictional, developed by AI, and designed “entirely to bring humour and pleasure”.

Legally, the copyright belongs to the company, but Mr Mashiach stresses that the product is meant as a “personalised gag present”, passfun.awardspace.us and the books do not get sold even more.

He wishes to expand his variety, creating various genres such as sci-fi, and demo.qkseo.in maybe using an autobiography service. It’s developed to be a light-hearted form of consumer AI - selling AI-generated goods to human customers.

It’s likewise a bit terrifying if, like me, you compose for a living. Not least since it probably took less than a minute to generate, and it does, certainly in some parts, sound simply like me.

Musicians, authors, artists and actors worldwide have actually revealed alarm about their work being utilized to train generative AI tools that then churn out comparable material based upon it.

“We need to be clear, when we are speaking about information here, we really imply human developers’ life works,” says Ed Newton Rex, founder of Fairly Trained, which projects for AI firms to regard creators’ rights.

“This is books, this is short articles, this is pictures. It’s works of art. It’s records … The entire point of AI training is to discover how to do something and after that do more like that.”

In 2023 a song featuring AI-generated voices of Canadian vocalists Drake and The Weeknd went viral on social media before being pulled from streaming platforms due to the fact that it was not their work and they had actually not granted it. It didn’t stop the track’s creator attempting to nominate it for a Grammy award. And even though the artists were fake, it was still hugely popular.

“I do not think the use of generative AI for imaginative purposes must be prohibited, but I do believe that generative AI for these purposes that is trained on people’s work without permission should be banned,” Mr Newton Rex adds. “AI can be really powerful however let’s construct it morally and fairly.”

OpenAI says Chinese rivals using its work for their AI apps

DeepSeek: The Chinese AI app that has the world talking

China’s DeepSeek AI shakes industry and dents America’s swagger

In the UK some organisations - including the BBC - have chosen to block AI designers from trawling their online content for training functions. Others have actually decided to collaborate - the Financial Times has partnered with ChatGPT developer OpenAI for instance.

The UK federal government is considering an overhaul of the law that would permit AI developers to utilize developers’ content on the web to assist establish their designs, unless the rights holders choose out.

Ed Newton Rex describes this as “madness”.

He mentions that AI can make advances in locations like defence, healthcare and logistics without trawling the work of authors, setiathome.berkeley.edu journalists and artists.

“All of these things work without going and changing copyright law and destroying the livelihoods of the country’s creatives,” he argues.

Baroness Kidron, a crossbench peer in your house of Lords, is also highly against removing copyright law for AI.

“Creative markets are wealth creators, 2.4 million tasks and a whole lot of pleasure,” says the Baroness, who is likewise an advisor to the Institute for Ethics in AI at Oxford University.

“The federal government is undermining one of its finest performing markets on the vague promise of development.”

A federal government spokesperson said: “No move will be made until we are absolutely confident we have a useful plan that provides each of our objectives: increased control for right holders to assist them license their material, access to top quality product to train leading AI designs in the UK, and more openness for ideal holders from AI designers.”

Under the UK government’s new AI strategy, a national data library consisting of public information from a large range of sources will also be offered to AI scientists.

In the US the future of federal rules to manage AI is now up in the air following President Trump’s return to the presidency.

In 2023 Biden signed an order that aimed to boost the safety of AI with, to name a few things, firms in the sector needed to share information of the functions of their systems with the US government before they are launched.

But this has now been reversed by Trump. It remains to be seen what Trump will do instead, however he is stated to want the AI sector to deal with less policy.

This comes as a number of lawsuits versus AI companies, and particularly versus OpenAI, continue in the US. They have actually been secured by everybody from the New York Times to authors, music labels, and even a comic.

They claim that the AI companies broke the law when they took their material from the web without their consent, and used it to train their systems.

The AI business argue that their actions fall under “reasonable usage” and are for that reason exempt. There are a variety of aspects which can make up fair usage - it’s not a straight-forward definition. But the AI sector is under increasing analysis over how it gathers training data and whether it need to be paying for it.

If this wasn’t all sufficient to contemplate, Chinese AI company DeepSeek has shaken the sector over the past week. It became the many downloaded complimentary app on Apple’s US App Store.

DeepSeek claims that it developed its innovation for a portion of the cost of the similarity OpenAI. Its success has raised security issues in the US, and threatens American’s current supremacy of the sector.

When it comes to me and a profession as an author, I think that at the minute, if I truly want a “bestseller” I’ll still have to write it myself. If anything, Tech-Splaining for Dummies highlights the existing weak point in generative AI tools for larger tasks. It has lots of errors and hallucinations, and it can be rather tough to check out in parts due to the fact that it’s so long-winded.

But provided how rapidly the tech is progressing, I’m uncertain for how long I can stay positive that my substantially slower human writing and editing abilities, are much better.

Register for our Tech Decoded newsletter to follow the greatest developments in international innovation, with analysis from BBC reporters all over the world.

Outside the UK? Sign up here.